A hard disk interface is a connection standard that allows the hard disk to communicate with a computer's motherboard. An interface defines, among other things, how data is transferred, how commands are processed, and how power is supplied to the drive in order to function properly.
An HDD needs a standardized interface, irrespective of how advanced its internal components are. In fact, the efficiency of a hard disk depends largely on the speed and capability of the interface it uses. If an interface is well designed, it ensures that the data transfer rates are fast, the signal interference is minimal, and the communication between the storage and the operating system is smooth. On the other hand, a slow or outdated interface can be a major bottleneck in hard disk performance.
Common HDD Interfaces
Here is an overview of the HDD interfaces that have been standardized by manufacturers over the years:
- PATA (Parallel ATA): One of the earliest interfaces; now obsolete.
- SATA (Serial ATA): A faster and more efficient interface; widely used today.
- SCSI (Small Computer System Interface): Used in older enterprise systems; predecessor to SAS.
- SAS (Serial Attached SCSI): Common in contemporary enterprise environments for higher performance.
- NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express): A modern high-speed interface for SSDs.
We will now explore the workings of interfaces to understand the crucial function that they perform.
HDD Interface Functions
Interfaces enable standardization in connectivity by providing a universal method of linking storage devices to computers. An HDD interface ensures compatibility between different manufacturers and hence prevents the need for proprietary solutions. For example, a SATA hard disk can connect to any SATA-compatible motherboard, irrespective of the brand that manufactured either the motherboard or the hard drive.
Interfaces also manage data transfer and the execution of commands. They govern how data moves between a hard drive and the CPU’s memory (RAM). The interface processes all the read and write requests and ensures that the data retrieval and storage are accurate.
Interfaces ensure error detection and data integrity. A hard disk interface has error detection and correction protocols to ensure that the data transmission is done reliably. For example, interfaces like SATA use the CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) algorithm to correct errors in data transmission.
Different interfaces perform these functions in different ways, which means some are better than others. We will discuss this in the next section, where we explore the evolution of hard drive interfaces.
Evolution of HDD Interfaces
The journey began in the early 1980s. The first milestone in the evolution of HDD interfaces was the ST-506 HDD interface, introduced by Shugart Technology (now Seagate) in 1980. It used a 20-pin cable for data exchange, a 34-pin cable for control signals, and one for power. The data rate for ST-506 was 5 Mbit/s (625 KB/s), with a seek time of 85 ms, while its updated version—the ST412—had a seek time of 30 ms.
Note: The ST-506 was the first hard drive with a 5.25-inch form factor. The interface used in this and the ST-412 became the standard for personal computers, and remained so till the early 1990s.
The next milestone was the introduction of the Parallel Advanced Technology Attachment (PATA) interface, introduced by Western Digital and Compaq. PATA was intended as an industry standard, with the drive controller directly on the drive. At this time, transfer rates had improved up to 133 MB/s for ATA-7, which required 80-conductor cables. PATA was instrumental in the widespread consumer adoption of HDDs in personal computers.
Note: PATA was originally referred to as ATA or IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics). It saw several updates throughout the 1990s, such as EIDE (ATA-2), ATAPI, ATA-4, and UATA. It was only after SATA (Serial ATA) was introduced in 2003 that it was renamed as PATA—to underscore the configurational difference.
The next stride came in 1998 when Fujitsu introduced its first Fiber Channel (FC) HDD. With fiber channels, Fujitsu achieved new levels of performance in terms of data transfer rates (up to 100 MB/s) for enterprise storage-based HDDs used in data centers.
At the turn of the century, the next big change happened with the announcement of the SATA interface, which promised to overcome all the limitations of PATA. It offered thinner serial links instead of bulky parallel cables. The data transfer rates were higher than in PATA. Also, the SATA interface included features like Hot Plug support and Native Command Queuing (NCQ).
Overall, it allowed consumer HDDs to offer higher speeds and performance. By 2004, SATA Revision 2.0 was available, which offered data transfer rates up to 300 MB/s.
In 2004, the industry took another stride with the launch of Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). SAS was able to mimic the high transfer rates of SATA but was more robust given the needs of enterprise-grade HDDs and had add-on features like a more robust control protocol, dual-port connectivity, and better fault tolerance.
In 2008, SATA Revision 3.0 was finalized. It boosted data rates up to 6.0 GB/s.
The next major leap happened in 2011 with the introduction of the first specification 1.0 of the NVM (Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller) Express. NVMe was designed to make the most of the speed of flash storage (SSDs). It used PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) lanes to bypass the limitations of legacy interfaces. This set new performance benchmarks for storage devices and was a major factor in the mainstream adoption of SSDs as a competitor to HDDs.
The next big milestone in the 2010s came in 2015 with Thunderbolt 3, as it adopted the USB-C connector. Thunderbolt 3 integrated PCIe and DisplayPort into one interface. The result was high-speed connectivity for external HDD drives.
| Year | Milestone | Company / Organization* | Significance | Max Transfer Rate |
| 1980 | ST-506 Interface | Shugart Technology | First commercial HDD interface; standardized connections | 5 Mbit/s (0.625 MB/s) |
| 1981 | ST-412HP Interface | Shugart Technology | Upgrade of the ST-412 interface; used RLL encoding for 50% faster bit rate | 7.5 Mbit/s (0.94 MB/s) |
| 1986 | PATA (IDE) Introduced | Western Digital & Compaq | Made HDDs easier to install; removed the need for separate controllers | 8.3 MB/s (ATA) |
| 1986 | SCSI-1 Introduced | ANSI | Allowed multiple drives to connect via a single bus; enterprise standard | 5 MB/s |
| 1990s | SCSI Becomes Enterprise Std | ANSI | Supported multiple drives; preferred for servers | SCSI-2: 20 MB/s; SCSI-3: 320 MB/s |
| 1994 | IEEE 1284 Std for Parallel Ports | IEEE SA | Standardized parallel ports; offered improved throughput for peripherals | 4 MB/s (max); ~2 MB/s observed |
| 1996 | USB 1.0 Introduced | USB-IF | Standardized external peripheral connections, including external storage | 1.5 MB/s (min), 12 MB/s (max) |
| 1998 | Fujitsu Produces First Fiber Channel HDD | Fujitsu | First HDD using Fiber Channel (FC); marked the shift to high-speed serial interfaces | 1 Gbit/s (125 MB/s) |
| 2000 | SATA Interface Introduced | SATA-IO | Shift from parallel to serial; improved speed & efficiency | 1.5 Gbit/s (188 MB/s) |
| 2003 | SATA 1.0 Released | SATA-IO | Implemented AHCI, Hot Plugging, and NCQ; easier to install; removed the need for separate controllers | 1.5 Gbit/s (188 MB/s) |
| 2004 | SAS Introduced | ANSI | Enhanced SCSI with serial communication; dual-port redundancy for enterprise storage | 3 Gbit/s (375 MB/s) |
| 2004 | SATA 2.0 Released | SATA-IO | Doubled transfer rate; improved NCQ; backward compatibility | 3 Gbit/s (375 MB/s) |
| 2008 | SATA 3.0 Finalized | SATA-IO | Increased speed; better command queuing for multi-threaded workloads | 6 Gbit/s (750 MB/s) |
| 2008 | USB 3.0 Introduced | USB-IF | High-speed external storage support; backward compatible | 625 MB/s |
| 2011 | NVMe 1.0 Released | NVM Express Consortium | Eliminated SATA bottlenecks for SSDs using PCIe for direct CPU communication | PCIe 3.0 (16x): 15.75 GB/s |
| 2011 | Thunderbolt 1 Introduced | Intel & Apple | First high-speed external interface using PCIe & DisplayPort | 10 Gbit/s (1.25 GB/s) |
| 2013 | USB 3.1 Introduced | USB-IF | Increased transfer speeds; introduced USB-C connector | 10 Gbit/s (1.25 GB/s) |
| 2015 | Thunderbolt 3 Uses USB-C | Intel & Apple | Combined PCIe & DisplayPort for high-speed external storage | 40 Gbit/s (5 GB/s) |
| 2017 | USB 3.2 Introduced | USB-IF | Increased data rates by allowing multi-lane transfer | 20 Gbit/s (2.5 GB/s) |
| 2018 | SD Express & microSD Express Introduced | SD Association | PCIe/NVMe in removable storage; boosted performance | PCIe 3.0 (985 MB/s – 3938 MB/s) |
| 2019 | USB 4 Released | USB-IF | Unified Thunderbolt 3 and USB into a single standard | 40 Gbit/s (5 GB/s) |
| 2022 | NVMe 2.0b Finalized | NVM Express Consortium | Future of high-speed storage; optimized for AI & cloud workloads | PCIe 4.0 (16x): 31.5 GB/s |
*Company/Organization Details
- ANSI: American National Standards Institute (1400+ members)
- IEEE SA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association (Approx. 500 members)
- USB-IF: USB Implementers Forum, Inc. (900+ members)
- SATA-IO: SATA International Organization (57 members, 32 contributors, and 4 promoters)
- NVM Express Consortium (100+ members)
- SD Association (Approx. 800 members)
HDD Interface – Current and Future Trends
Today, the SATA and SAS interfaces are the most widely accepted ones, and in high-speed SSD storage, PCIe-based NVMe is the most common interface. Revisions to the SATA interface have improved transfer rates exponentially, but there is a constraint because of the old architecture in use.
Similarly, with SAS, although it offers many advantages over parallel SCSI, it still faces limitations. NVMe is designed specifically for non-volatile memory and overcomes most of these bottlenecks. It uses the PCIe bus system, because of which it can offer very high bandwidth and low latency. In the near future, upgrades to the PCIe versions are expected, which means the NVMe interface is likely to continue to be very popular.
Since 1980, we have gone from a data transfer rate of about 5 MB per second to 30+ GB per second. Interfaces will continue to be a deciding factor in the evolution of data storage because, in spite of the quality of the internal components of the storage media and the brilliance of its architecture, it is the interface that eventually governs the delivery of the promise of great performance and makes it a reality.
Similarly, with SAS, although it offers many advantages over parallel SCSI, it still faces limitations. NVMe is designed specifically for non-volatile memory and overcomes most of these bottlenecks. It uses the PCIe bus system, because of which it can offer very high bandwidth and low latency. In the near future, upgrades to the PCIe versions are expected, which means the NVMe interface is likely to continue to be very popular.
Since 1980, we have gone from a data transfer rate of about 5 MB per second to 30+ GB per second. Interfaces will continue to be a deciding factor in the evolution of data storage because, in spite of the quality of the internal components of the storage media and the brilliance of its architecture, it is the interface that eventually governs the delivery of the promise of great performance and makes it a reality.
About The Author
Data Recovery Expert & Content Strategist
